Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service CCBS
Our CCBS database includes more than 11,000 abstracts of publications. Perform your own detailed search of TLC/HPTLC literature and find relevant information.
The Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service CCBS contains all abstracts of CBS issues beginning with CBS 51. The database is updated after the publication of every other CBS edition. Currently the Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service includes more than 11'000 abstracts of publications between 1983 and today. With the online version you can perform your own detailed TLC/HPTLC literature search:
- Full text search: Enter a keyword, e.g. an author's name, a substance, a technique, a reagent or a term and see all related publications
- Browse and search by CBS classification: Select one of the 38 CBS classification categories where you want to search by a keyword
- Keyword register: select an initial character and browse associated keywords
- Search by CBS edition: Select a CBS edition and find all related publications
Registered users can create a tailor made PDF of selected articles throughout CCBS search – simply use the cart icon on the right hand of each abstract to create your individual selection of abstracts. You can export your saved items to PDF by clicking the download icon.
J. Planar Chromatogr. 32, 149-156 (2019). HPTLC of ondansetron (1) and pantoprazole (2) in pure forms and normal saline intravenous infusions on silica gel with chloroform - methanol - ethyl acetate 3:1:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 302 nm. The hRF values for (1) and (2) were 50 and 73, respectively. Linearity was between 30 and 1000 ng/zone for (1) and 50 and 1000 ng/zone for (2). The intermediate precision was below 2 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 8 and 23 ng/zone for (1) and 16 and 47 ng/zone for (2), respectively. Recovery rate was 99.8 % for (1) and 99.9 % for (2).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 32, 133-140 (2019). HPTLC of granisetron (1), aprepitant (2) and deflazacort (3) in drug products and spiked plasma on silica gel with chloroform - methanol - formic acid 36:3:2. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 200 nm. The hRF values for (1) to (3) were 12, 45 and 58, respectivley. Linearity ranged 0.1-2.0 µg/zone for (1) and (3) and 0.2-4.0 µg/zone for (2). The intermediate precision was below 1.4 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 27 and 82 ng/zone for (1), 48 and 140 ng/zone for (2) and 31 and 94 ng/zone for (3), respectively. Recovery rate was 99.9 % for (1) and (2) and 99.7 % for (3).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 32, 81-87 (2019). HPTLC of glycyrrhizic acid in Glycyrrhiza glabra on silica gel with n-butanol - acetic acid - water 7:2:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 260 nm. The hRF value of glycyrrhizic acid was 33. Linearity was between 0.2 and 2.5 µg/zone. The intermediate precision was below 6 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 160 and 487 ng/zone. Recovery rate was 98.8 %.
J. Planar Chromatogr. 32, 115-120 (2019). HPTLC of ellagic acid (1), gallic acid (2) and ferulic acid (3) in the leaves of Elaeagnus angustifolia on silica gel with toluene - ethyl formate - formic acid 5:6.6:1.5. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 290 nm. The hRF values for (1) to (3) were 36, 47 and 69, respectively. Linearity was between 56-677 ng/zone for (1), 100-1207 ng/zone for (2) and 100-1205 ng/zone for (3). The intermediate precision was below 2 % (n=6). Recovery rate was 101.4 % for (1), 100.9 % for (2) and 100.2 % for (3).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 32, 89-93 (2019). HPTLC of diosgenin in the seeds of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) on silica gel with hexane - acetone 4:1. Detection by dipping into an anisaldehyde–sulfuric acid reagent, followed by heating at 105 °C for 10 min. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 430 nm. The hRF value of diosgenin was 30. Linearity was between 50 and 400 ng/zone. The intermediate precision was below 2 % (n=6). The LOD and LOQ for diosgenin were 9 and 19 ng/zone. Recovery was between 98.0 and 99.2 %.
J. Planar Chromatogr. 32, 127-131 (2019). HPTLC of paracetamol (1), chlorpheniramine maleate (2) and pseudoephedrine (3) on silica gel with methanol - toluene - acetic acid 44:16:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 254 nm. The hRF values for (1) to (3) were 81, 10 and 71, respectively. Linearity was between 50-600 µg/zone for (1), 1-30 µg/zone for (2) and 10-35 µg/zone for (3). The intermediate precision was below 2 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 20 and 49 µg/zone for (1) [Editor´s note: LOD should be <200 ng/zone.], 0.07 and 0.43 µg/zone for (2) and 0.31 and 0.96 µg/zone for (3), respectively. Recovery rate was 99.7 % for (1), 101.6 % for (2) and 99.7 % for (3).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 32, 109-114 (2019). HPTLC of fructose (1), glucose (2), maltose (3), raffinose (4) and sucrose (5) in the roots of the seven Asparagus species A. adscendens, A. racemosus, A. retrofractus, A. officinalis, A. densiflorus, A. falcatus, and A. sprengeri on silica gel with propanol - ethyl acetate - water 6:3:1. Detection by spraying with a methanolic solution of diphenylamine, aniline, and ortho-phosphoric acid, followed by heating at 140 °C for 2-3 min. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 600 nm. The hRF values for (1) to (5) were 55, 50, 31, 11 and 46, respectively. Linearity was between 100 and 500 ng for (1) to (5). The intermediate precision was below 2 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 22 and 66 ng for (1), 13 and 40 ng for (2), 51 and 155 ng for (3), 13 and 39 ng for (4) and 76 and 229 ng for (5), respectively. Average recovery was 97.9 % for (1), 99.9 % for (2), 99.3 % for (3), 98.3 % for (4) and 97.8 % for (5).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 32, 121-126 (2019). HPTLC of quercetin (1), rutin (2), and
gallic acid (3) in the aerial parts of Amaranthus tricolor on silica gel with toluene - ethyl acetate - formic acid 7:5:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 254 nm. The hRF values for (1) to (3) were 49, 14 and 28, respectively. Linearity was between 200-800 ng for (1), 200-500 ng for (2) and 200-600 ng for (3). The intermediate precision was below 1 % (n=6). The LOD and LOQ were 22 and 68 ng/zone for (1), 14 and 55 ng/zone for (2) and 16 and 52 ng/zone for (3), respectively. Recovery was between 99.0 and 99.9 % for (1), 98.4 and 99.3 % for (2) and 99.1 and 99.8 % for (3).