Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service CCBS
Our CCBS database includes more than 11,000 abstracts of publications. Perform your own detailed search of TLC/HPTLC literature and find relevant information.
The Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service CCBS contains all abstracts of CBS issues beginning with CBS 51. The database is updated after the publication of every other CBS edition. Currently the Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service includes more than 11'000 abstracts of publications between 1983 and today. With the online version you can perform your own detailed TLC/HPTLC literature search:
- Full text search: Enter a keyword, e.g. an author's name, a substance, a technique, a reagent or a term and see all related publications
- Browse and search by CBS classification: Select one of the 38 CBS classification categories where you want to search by a keyword
- Keyword register: select an initial character and browse associated keywords
- Search by CBS edition: Select a CBS edition and find all related publications
Registered users can create a tailor made PDF of selected articles throughout CCBS search – simply use the cart icon on the right hand of each abstract to create your individual selection of abstracts. You can export your saved items to PDF by clicking the download icon.
J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 13-21 (2022). HPTLC of guggulsterone E (1) and Z (2) in Commiphora mukul on silica gel with toluene - acetone 9:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 250 nm. The hRF values for (1) and (2) were 18 and 23, respectively. Linearity was between 60 and 360 ng/zone for (1) and (2).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 61-71 (2022). HPTLC of empagliflozin (1) in the presence of metformin HCl (2) on silica gel with toluene - methanol - ammonia - glacial acetic acid 72:26:1:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 230 nm. The hRF values for (1) and (2) were 15 and 48, respectively. Linearity was between 11 and 112 ng/zone for (1) and 85 and 850 ng/zone for (2). Interday and intra-day precisions were below 2 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 0.6 and 1,7 ng/zone for (1) and 5 and 15 ng/zone for (2), respectively. Recovery was found to be in the range of 99.4-101.0 % for (1) and 100.3-101.4 % for (2). Degradation products were characterized by liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization‒quadrupole-time of flight‒tandem mass spectrometry (LC‒ESI‒QTOF‒MS/MS).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 23-33 (2022). HPTLC of 6‑gingerol (1), guggulsterone (2) E and guggulsterone Z (3) on silica gel with toluene - acetone 9:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 280 nm. The hRF values for (1) and (2) were 15, 19 and 25, respectively. Linearity was between 100 and 1200 ng/zone for (1) to (3). Interday and intra-day precisions were below 3 % (n=5). The LOD and LOQ were 100 and 400 ng/zone for (1) to (3), respectively. Recovery was between 95.4 and 101.05 %.
J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 43-50 (2022). HPTLC of curcumin (1) and cineole (2) on silica gel with n-hexane - ethyl acetate 12:7. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 242 nm. The hRF values for (1) and (2) were 31 and 71, respectively. Linearity was between 1 and 6 µg/zone for (1) and 10 and 60 µg/zone for (2). Interday and intra-day precisions were below 2 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 45 and 135 ng/zone for (1) and 34 and 102 ng/zone for (2), respectively. Recovery was between 93.3 and 98.8 % for (1) and 94.6 and 99.4 % for (2).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 51-59 (2022). HPTLC of codeine (1), paracetamol (2), p-aminophenol (3) and caffeine (4) on silica gel with chloroform - methanol - acetone - ammonia 80:10:20:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 220 nm. The hRF values for (1) to (4) were 24, 38, 46 and 61, respectively. Linearity was between 0.3 and 120 µg/zone for (1) and (4) and 1 and 20 µg/zone for (2) and (3). Interday and intra-day precisions were below 1 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 0.06 and 0.21 µg/zone for (1), 0.23 and 0.7 µg/zone for (2), 0.24 and 0.82 µg/zone for (3) and 0.07 and 0.82 µg/zone for (4), respectively. Average recovery was 101.4 % for (1), 100.1 % for (2), 98.9 % for (3) and 98.3 % for (4).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 35-41 (2022). HPTLC of quercetin (1) and gallic acid (2) in the leaves of Annona reticulata on silica gel with toluene - ethyl acetate - formic acid 45:50:8. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 367 nm. The hRF values for (1) and (2) were 71 and 63, respectively. Linearity was between 200 and 1000 ng/zone for (1) and 200 and 1200 ng/zone for (2). Interday and intra-day precisions were below 2 % (n=5). The LOD and LOQ were 21 and 65 ng/zone for (1) and 15 and 55 ng/zone for (2), respectively. Recovery was between 98.0 and 99.1 % for (1) and 99.3 and 100.3 % for (2).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 3-12 (2022). HPTLC of alisol B 23-acetate (1), alisol B (2), alisol A (3) and alisol C 23-acetate (4) in the rhizomes of Alisma orientale on silica gel with cyclohexane - ethyl acetate 1:1. The hRF values for (1), (4), (2) and (3) were 62, 42, 28 and 9, respectively Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 254 nm for (1) and 208 nm for (2), (3) and (4). Linearity was between 125 and 2000 μg/zone for (1) and 83 and 2000 μg/zone for (2), (3) and (4). Interday and intra-day precisions were below 1 % (n=3). Average recovery was 94.2 % for (1), 90.3 % for (2), 97.0 % for (3) and 90.2 % for (4).
J. Planar Chromatogr. 34, 481-492 (2021). HPTLC of cynaroside (1), apiin (2), diosmin (3) and linarin (4) in Ziziphora clinopodioides on silica gel with ethyl acetate - dichloromethane - ethanol - formic acid - water 10:13:6:2:4. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 350 nm. The hRF values for (1) to (4) were 30, 36, 45 and 60, respectively. Linearity was between 0.05 and 0.35 μg/zone for (1), 0.02 and 0.14 μg/zone for (2), 0.15 and 0.60 μg/zone for (3) and 0.05 and 0.70 μg/zone for (4). Interday and intra-day precisions were below 5 % (n=6). The LOD and LOQ were 5 and 16 ng/zone for (1) and (2), 150 and 500 ng/zone for (3) and 10 and 33 ng/zone for (4), respectively. Average recovery was 98.9 % for (1), 100.7 % for (2), 98.8 % for (3) and 100.2 % for (4).