Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service CCBS
Our CCBS database includes more than 11,000 abstracts of publications. Perform your own detailed search of TLC/HPTLC literature and find relevant information.
The Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service CCBS contains all abstracts of CBS issues beginning with CBS 51. The database is updated after the publication of every other CBS edition. Currently the Cumulative CAMAG Bibliography Service includes more than 11'000 abstracts of publications between 1983 and today. With the online version you can perform your own detailed TLC/HPTLC literature search:
- Full text search: Enter a keyword, e.g. an author's name, a substance, a technique, a reagent or a term and see all related publications
- Browse and search by CBS classification: Select one of the 38 CBS classification categories where you want to search by a keyword
- Keyword register: select an initial character and browse associated keywords
- Search by CBS edition: Select a CBS edition and find all related publications
Registered users can create a tailor made PDF of selected articles throughout CCBS search – simply use the cart icon on the right hand of each abstract to create your individual selection of abstracts. You can export your saved items to PDF by clicking the download icon.
J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 44, 760-765 (2021). HPTLC of chrysin in chrysin loaded phytosomes on silica gel with n-hexane - ethyl acetate - methanol - formic acid 40:40:5:1. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 268 nm. The hRF value for chrysin was 78. Linearity was between 50 and 250 ng/zone. Inter-day and intra-day precisions were below 2 % (n=3). The LOQ was 77 ng/zone.
J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 44, 809-819 (2021). HPTLC of major cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa on silica gel with hexane - ethyl acetate - methanol 7:2:1. Detection by spraying with anisaldehyde sulfuric acid reagent. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 525 nm for lupeol. The hRF values for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid were 55 and 36, respectively. Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) tools, such as the Design of Experiments (DoE) was used for a better understanding of the analytes’ chromatographic behavior as a function of the mobile phase composition.
J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 44, 599-609 (2021). HPTLC of lupeol in Betula alnoides on silica gel with chloroform. Detection by spraying with anisaldehyde sulfuric acid reagent. Quantitative determination by absorbance measurement at 525 nm for lupeol. The hRF value for lupeol was 44. Linearity was between 0.8 and 2.4 µg/zone. Inter-day and intra-day precisions were below 5 % (n=3). The LOD and LOQ were 0.2 and 0.5 µg/zone. Recovery was between 100.5 and 106.8 %.
J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2022.2143798 (2022). HPTLC of ferrocene and acetyl ferrocene from their synthetic mixtures on silica gel with ethyl acetate - petroleum ether 1:9. Detection by exposure to iodine vapor.
J Chromatogr A, 1647, 462153 (2021). Samples were extracts of Pittosporum angustifolium leaves (Pittosporaceae), either pure or fermented 1-4 weeks in NaCl solution, as well as acarbose, gallic acid, β-sitosterol, caffeic and chlorogenic acids, as standards. HPTLC on silica gel (prewashed with methanol and dried 15 min at 105 °C) with n-hexane – ethyl acetate – acetic acid 15:9:1. Derivatization by immersion (speed 5 cm/s, time 1 s): (A) into DPPH• 0.2 % solution, to detect radical scavengers; (B) into neutralized ferric chloride (3 % in ethanol), followed by 5 min heating at 110 °C, for detection of phenolic compounds; (C) into anisaldehyde – sulphuric acid reagent, followed by 10 min heating at 110 °C, to detect terpenes and steroids. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) for α-amylase inhibition assay (D) by immersion into enzyme solution, incubation 15 min at 37 °C, immersion into substrate solution (starch 2 % in water), incubation 20 min at 37 °C and immersion into Gram’s iodine solution for detection (inhibition zones appear blue on white background). In all cases, visualization under white light. Quantification was performed on pictures using image processing software, and expressed as equivalents to the respective standards used for calibration curves: (A) and (B) gallic acid (LOQ 250 and 740 ng/band, respectively), (C) β-sitosterol (LOQ 1.5 µg/band), (D) acarbose (LOQ 8 µg/band). Zones of interest, scraped from untreated plates and washed with ethyl acetate, were submitted by ATR-FTIR analysis. An amylase inhibiting zone (hRF 85) present in all extracts was identified as fatty acid esters: ethyl palmitate in unfermented and methyl linoleate in fermented extracts. Moreover, fermented extracts contained antioxidant zones (hRF 15 – 20), identified as monomers and oligomers (including hydroxycinnamic, guaiacyl, syringyl derivatives) from decomposed lignin.
J Chromatogr A, 1625, 461230 (2020). Samples were extracts of Chinese plants: Acorus tatarinowii (= Acorus calamus var. angustatus) rhizomes (Araceae / Acoraceae) (1), Angelica sinensis roots (Apiaceae) (2), Gynura japonica rhizomes (Asteraceae) (3), Phellodendron chinense bark (Rutaceae) (4), Picrasma quassioides twigs and leaves (Simaroubaceae) (5), Rheum sp. roots and rhizomes (R. palmatum, R. tanguticum and/or R. officinale) (Polygonaceae) (6), Sophora flavescens roots (Fabaceae) (7), Dendrobium stems (D. aphyllum, D. aurantiacum var. dennaeanum, D. chrysanthum, D. chrysotoxum, D. gratiosissimum, D. hercoglossum, D. thyrsiflorum, D. trigonopus and D. williamsonii) (Orchidaceae) (8). Standards were: gigantol (from D. sonia); methoxycarbonyl-β-carboline (MCC from (5)); caffeic acid, emodin; senecionine and β-asarone; crategolic acid (= maslinic acid), corosolic acid, oleanic acid, ursolic acid; sesquiterpenoids (atractylenolides I – III) from Atractylodes macrocephala (Asteraceae); flavonoids (baicalein, baicalin, daidzin, hesperidin, wogonin) from Scutellaria baicalensis roots (Lamiaceae). HPTLC on silica gel with 10 mobile phases, depending on the samples. Detection under UV 254 nm and white light. For (3), derivatization with Dragendorff’s reagent (bismuth potassium iodide solution) for visualization of alkaloids. Zones of interest on underivatized plates were identified by a triple-quadrupole – linear ion-trap MS, the compounds being removed from the layer by a continuous-wave (445 nm) diode laser pointer through a DART interface (Direct Analysis in Real-Time, helium as gas for plasma-based ambient ionization, discharge needle voltage 1.5 kV, grid voltage 350 V, capillary temperature 300 °C and voltage 40 V, full scan in positive ionization mode in m/z range 150-800). Pigment standards were used for validation of this laser-assisted HPTLC-DART-MS method: malachite green, crystal violet, chrysoidin, auramine O, rhodamine B, Sudan red I – IV, Sudan red G, dimethyl yellow. Afterwards, the same HPTLC-MS method was applied to the origin / species determination of Dendrobium samples, based on the presence of four bibenzyl compounds erianin, gigantol, moscatilin, tristin. Erianin was present only in D. chrysotoxum, whereas none of these were detected in D. hercoglossum. Several components of the extracts were thus identified: asarone (a phenylpropanoid) in (1); phthalide lactones (butenylphthalide, ligustilide and chuanxiong lactone) in (2); co-eluting pyrrolizidine alkaloids (senecionine and seneciphylline) in (3); benzylisoquinoline alkaloid berberine in (4); alkaloids (canthinone alkaloids and MCC) in (5); anthraquinones (rhein, aloe-emodin, emodin, emodin methyl ether, chrysophanol) and (in negative mode) caffeic acid (a hydroxycinnamic acid) and corosolic, maslinic and oleanic acids (triterpenoids) in (6); quinolizidine alkaloids (matrine, oxymatrine, oxysophocarpine, sophoridine) in (7).
J Chromatogr A, 1625, 461230 (2020). Samples were methanolic extracts of commercial supplements containing Magnolia sp. bark (Magnoliaceae), as well as honokiol (1) and magnolol (2) (biphenyl neolignans) as separated or mixed standards. TLC and HPTLC on silica gel with n-hexane – ethyl acetate – ethanol 16:3:1. Visualization under UV 254 nm. Quantification of (1) and (2) by densitometric scanning in absorbance mode at 290 nm (hRF were 34 and 39, LOQ 200 ng and 280 ng/spot, respectively). Variability between samples from the same brand supplement was also determined, as well as extraction yields. Effect-directed analysis with 3 assays: A) to detect radical scavengers, immersion into DPPH• 0.02 % solution; B) to detect activity against Gram-negative bacteria, immersion into Aliivibrio fischeri suspension, followed by recording the bioluminescence; C) to detect activity against Gram-positive bacteria, immersion into Bacillus subtilis, followed by incubation 2 h at 28 °C and immersion into MTT 1 g/L. Compounds (1) and (2) were active in all assays. Identification of zones of interest by eluting with methanol from untreated TLC layer through the oval elution head of a TLC-MS interface directly to a single Quadrupole MS (electrospray ionization, interface temperature 350°C, heat block temperature 400°C, desolvation line temperature 250°C, detector voltage 4.5kV). Full mass scan spectra were recorded in the positive and negative ionization modes in m/z range 150–800. Other molecules (from other ingredients) were identified: piperine (alkaloid) and/or its geometrical isomers (active on A, hRF 29-30); and daidzein (active on A and B, hRF 18), isoflavone from Pueraria montana root (Fabaceae). Stability was assessed through 2D-HPTLC, by repeating the same development method in the orthogonal direction 4 h or 20 h after the first separation. Degradation products of (1) and (2) appeared after 20 h (but not at 4 h), including a honokiol dimer (formed in tracks of (1) and of (2)).
J Chromatogr A, 1620, 460970 (2020). Samples were ethyl acetate extracts of Lavandula angustifolia herb and flowers and of aerial parts of other Lamiaceae (Ocimum basilicum, Origanum vulgare, Thymus vulgaris, Rosmarinus officinalis, Salvia officinalis), as well as standards. HPTLC on silica gel (pre-washed with methanol and heated 30 min at 105 °C) with n-hexane – ethyl acetate – acetic acid 70:27:3. Documentation at UV 254 nm and 365 nm and white light before and after A) derivatization with anisaldehyde – sulfuric acid reagent, followed by 10 min heating at 110 °C; B) spraying with DPPH• (0.2 % in methanol), followed by 30 min incubation in the dark; C) α-amylase inhibition assay by immersion into enzyme solution, incubation 30 min at 37 °C, immersion into substrate solution (starch 1 % in water), incubation 20 min at 37 °C and immersion into Gram’s iodine solution for detection (inhibition zones appear blue on white background). Quantification was performed on pictures using image processing software, and expressed as equivalents to the respective standards used for calibration curves: A) β-sitosterol (LOQ 1.5 µg/band), B) gallic acid (LOQ 60 ng/band), C) acarbose (LOQ 8 µg/band). An amylase inhibiting zone (hRF 68) present in all samples (except L. angustifolia), scraped from untreated plates and washed with ethyl acetate, was tentatively identified by ATR-FTIR analysis as oleanolic acid (pentacyclic triterpene).