J Chromatogr A, 1621, 461044 (2020). Samples were five isoquinoline alkaloids (berberine, chelerythrine, chelidonine, coptisine, sanguinarine) either as standard mixture or present in a Chelidonium majus (Papaveraceae) herb extract obtained with HCl 0.05 M in methanol. Separation on TLC and HPTLC silica gel layers with a screening of mobile phases consisting of eutectic mixtures of chemicals and/or phytochemicals. These homogenous stable liquids called DES (deep eutectic solvents) were obtained either simply by mixing, or by mixing followed by heating at 50°C, or by mixing with water for dissolution followed by dehydratation through rotary evaporation. For polarity adjustment, the DES phases were tested pure or diluted with acetone, chloroform, diethyl ether, methanol, or water. Visualization under UV 366 nm. The best separation was obtained with menthol – phenol in equimolar mixture, with 35 % methanol added (hRF values of the selected alkaloids were 33, 39, 79, 20 and 52, respectively).

J Chromatogr A, 1598, 196-208 (2019). Samples were acertone – water 7:3 extracts of Reynoutria japonica (= Fallopia japonica = Polygonum cuspidatum) rhizomes (Polygonaceae) as well as flavanols (catechin, epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, epigallocatechin gallate) and procyanidins (A1, A2, B1–B3 and C1) as standards. HPTLC on diol silica gel with: (MP1) acetonitrile; (MP2) ethyl acetate; (MP3) ethyl acetate – formic acid 90:1; or (MP4) toluene – acetone – formic acid 3:6:1. Prewashing of the plates with mobile phase was needed only with MP1. After drying under hot air stream, derivatization by automated immersion into DMACA (dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde) – HCl solution (60 mg in 13 mL HCl + 187 mL ethanol), followed by 2 min drying under warm air stream. Visualization under UV 366 nm and white light, densitometry in absorption/reflectance mode at 280 nm (before derivatization) or 655 nm (10 min after derivatization). Bands of interest were eluted from layer with acetonitrile – methanol 2:1 through the oval elution head of a TLC-MS interface pump, into a RP18 liquid chromatography guard column, followed by a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. Full scan mass spectra (m/z 150–2000) were recorded in negative mode using electrospray ionization (spray voltage 4 kV, capillary temperature 200◦C, capillary voltage -38.8 V). Monomer gallates to hexamer gallates were detected, separated with MP1, MP2 or MP4; monomers and oligomers (not gallates) were separated with MP3 (up to hexamers) and with MP1 and MP4 (up to decamers). Moreover, enhanced absorption of standards was also studied for influence of mobile phases, of layers (diol silica gel vs. classical silica gel vs. cellulose) and of luminosity (light vs. dark).

J Chromatogr A, 1675, 463167 (2022). Samples were ethanol extracts (and their flash chromatography fractions) of Prunus armeniaca leaves (Rosaceae), as well as betulinic, linolenic, maslinic (= crataegolic), oleanolic, ursolic acids and pygenic acids A (= corosolic acid) and B b as standards. When needed, to improve separation of triterpenoids, reversible pre-chromatographic derivatization was performed in situ by applying 10 µL iodine solution (2 % in chloroform) either before development on the deposit band, or for 2D-HPTLC after a first separation up to 60 mm and before a second orthogonal separation. Layers were covered 10 min with glass sheet after iodine application, and then dried 1 min under cold air stream. HPTLC on silica gel with chloroform – ethyl acetate – methanol 20:3:2, 85:9:6, or 15:2:3), followed by 5-10 min drying under cold air stream (eliminating iodine completely). Post-chromatographic derivatization by immersion (time 2 s, speed 3 cm/s) into vanillin – sulfuric acid (40 mg and 200µL, respectively, in 10 mL ethanol), followed by heating 5 min at 110 °C. Antibacterial effect-directed analysis was performed by immersion (time 8 s) into Bacillus subtilis suspension, followed by 2 h incubation at 37 °C, immersion in MTT solution and 30 min incubation at 37 °C. Active bands were eluted from layer with methanol through the oval elution head of a TLC-MS interface pump, into a single quadrupole mass spectrometer to record full scan mass spectra (m/z 200–1200 in both modes) using electrospray ionization (interface temperature 350°C, heat block temperature 400°C, desolvation line temperature 250°C, detector voltage 4.5kV). Five triterpenoids were identified: betulinic, corosolic, maslinic, oleanolic and ursolic acids, acid, as well as two fatty acids: linolenic and palmitic acid.

J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 481-490 (2022). HPTLC of oleo‑gum resin of raw and purified Commiphora wightii on silica gel with chloroform - ethyl acetate - formic acid - acetic acid
30:9:2:2. Detection by spraying with anisaldehyde sulfuric acid reagent, followed by heating at 105 °C until the development of visible zones. The plate was analyzed under UV light at 254 and 366 nm, and after derivatization at 541 nm. 

J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 395-402 (2022). HPTLC of Padina boergesenii on silica gel with toluene - ethyl acetate 93:7. Detection by spraying with different reagents: anisaldehyde‒sulfuric acid reagent, vanillin‒sulfuric acid reagent, methanolic‒sulfuric acid reagent and Liebermann‒Burchard reagent (1 mL concentrated sulfuric acid, 20 mL acetic anhydride and 100 mL chloroform). Fingerprint analysis under UV light at 254 and 366 nm.

J Chromatogr A, 1608, 460415 (2019). Samples were acetonitrile extracts of Annona cherimola fruit peel, pulp and seeds (Annonaceae), as well as caffeic acid as standards. HPTLC on silica gel with chloroform – ethyl acetate – propanol 21:2:2 for peel extracts, with chloroform – methanol 9:1 for seed extracts. Derivatization by spraying Dragendorff’s reagent for alkaloids, secondary amines and non-nitrogenous oxygenated compounds.  Effect-directed assay was performed for inhibitors of α-glucosidase. Before sample application, plates were developed with enzyme substrate (2-naphthyl-α-D-glucopyranoside 0.1 % in methanol) and dried 20 min at 60 °C. Then, samples were applied and separated, and mobile phase was removed by heating 10 min at 60 °C. The chromatogram was sprayed with 4 mL enzyme solution (5 unit/mL in 100 mM phosphate buffer,  pH 7.4), liquid excess was removed under lukewarm air stream, the plate was incubated 10 min at 37 °C in a moisture box, followed by spraying chromogenic reagent Fast Blue salt B 0.1 % in water, giving after 2 min white inhibition bands visible on purple background under white light. Plate image was documented under illumination (reflectance mode) with white light. The bands of 3 inhibiting compounds were analyzed in a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. 1) Full scan mass spectra (m/z 50−1000) in the positive ionization mode were recorded using electrospray ionization (ESI, spray voltage 3 kV, desolvation line temperature 250 °C, block temperature 400 °C) for compounds directly eluted with methanol – acetonitrile through the oval elution head of a TLC-MS interface pump. 2) Compounds were also isolated (either eluted directly from the plate into a vial through the same interface, or scraped from the plate and extracted with methanol – chloroform into a vial), dried, and submitted to HPLC-DAD-MS/MS; MS-MS spectra were recorded in the same conditions, using argon as collision gas and collision cell voltages from -20 and -40 V. Inhibitors were identified as phenolamides (phenylethyl cinnamides): moupinamide (hRF 66 in peels, 56 in seeds), N-trans-feruloyl phenethylamine (hRF 76 in peels), N-trans-p-coumaroyl tyramine (hRF 44 in seeds).

J. Planar Chromatogr. 35, 313-330 (2022).  HPTLC of orange peel extract on silica gel with gradient multiple development using seven different polarity ranges: cyclohexane, cyclohexane - n-heptane 3:7, cyclohexane - methyl tert-butyl ether 43:7, cyclohexane - methyl tert-butyl ether 7:3, cyclohexane - methyl tert-butyl ether 3:7, methyl tert-butyl ether, methyl acetate - ethanol 9:1, ethyl acetate - ethanol - formic acid 44:5:1. Detection by spraying with vanillin reagent (100 mg vanillin dissolved in 9.8 mL ethanol and 0.2 mL sulfuric acid), followed by heating at 100 °C for 2 min. DPPH staining was performed with 2 mL of a DPPH solution (15 mg dissolved in 10 mL of methanol). Bioautography was performed by dipping into Aliivibrio fischeri bacteria suspension for 6 s, followed by measurement of bioluminescence within 15 min. In this sample, more than 50 compounds could be separated.

J Chromatogr A, 1598, 209-215 (2019). Samples were methanolic extracts of honeys from Robinia pseudoacacia (Fabaceae) or from Tilia spp. (Tiliaceae / Malvaceae), as well as standards: abscisic acid (sesquiterpenoid), caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, cinnamic acid, ferulic acid (phenolic acids), chrysin (flavone), myricetin, quercetin (flavonols), naringenin (flavanone). HPTLC on silica gel with chloroform – ethyl acetate – formic acid 5:4:1. Visualization under UV 254 nm and 366 nm, before and after derivatization by spraying with aluminium chloride (1 % in methanol), which rendered flavone bands bright yellow. Quantitative absorbance measuremet by densitometry at 366 nm. Linearity was in the range of 12,5–200 µg/mL for most standards (25–400 µg/mL for chrysin). Main differences observed in samples: 1) abscisic acid (hRF 56) and chrysin (hRF 82) were present only in Tilia honey samples, quercetin (hRF 55) only in Robinia honey; 2) ferulic acid (hRF 60) was the most prominent blue band in Tilia honey samples (1.35–18.73 g/kg of honey), and less intense in Robinia honey (0–1.24 g/kg of honey). Multivariate analysis was performed in two different ways with principal component analysis.